4.7 Article

Nucleotides in both donor and acceptor splice sites are responsible for choice in NAGNAG tandem splice sites

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
卷 78, 期 21-22, 页码 6979-6993

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-021-03943-2

关键词

RNA splicing; Alternative splicing; Splicing isoform; NAG choice

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [MUNI/A/1099/2019]
  2. Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation [2020001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among alternative splicing events in the human transcriptome, tandem NAGNAG acceptor splice sites represent an appreciable proportion, producing two splicing isoforms differing by three nucleotides. The choice of NAG in tandem splice site depends considerably not only on the concerned acceptor, but also on the upstream donor splice site sequence. The competition between different branch points and their composition also play a significant role in NAG choice.
Among alternative splicing events in the human transcriptome, tandem NAGNAG acceptor splice sites represent an appreciable proportion. Both proximal and distal NAG can be used to produce two splicing isoforms differing by three nucleotides. In some cases, the upstream exon can be alternatively spliced as well, which further increases the number of possible transcripts. In this study, we showed that NAG choice in tandem splice site depends considerably not only on the concerned acceptor, but also on the upstream donor splice site sequence. Using an extensive set of experiments with systematically modified two-exonic minigene systems of AFAP1L2 or CSTD gene, we recognized the third and fifth intronic upstream donor splice site position and the tandem acceptor splice site region spanning from -10 to +2, including NAGNAG itself, as the main drivers. In addition, competition between different branch points and their composition were also shown to play a significant role in NAG choice. All these nucleotide effects appeared almost additive, which explained the high variability in proximal versus distal NAG usage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据