4.7 Article

MCMV-based vaccine vectors expressing full-length viral proteins provide long-term humoral immune protection upon a single-shot vaccination

期刊

CELLULAR & MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 234-244

出版社

CHIN SOCIETY IMMUNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/s41423-021-00814-5

关键词

Vaccine vector; SARS-CoV-2; Influenza; Cytomegalovirus; humoral imunity

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony [14-76103-84]
  2. Helmholtz Association Eu Partnering grant MCMVaccine [PEI-008]
  3. European Union [101003650]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CMV vectors induce long-term cellular immunity and long-term immune protection against clinically relevant respiratory pathogens.
Global pandemics caused by influenza or coronaviruses cause severe disruptions to public health and lead to high morbidity and mortality. There remains a medical need for vaccines against these pathogens. CMV (cytomegalovirus) is a beta-herpesvirus that induces uniquely robust immune responses in which remarkably large populations of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells are maintained for a lifetime. Hence, CMV has been proposed and investigated as a novel vaccine vector for expressing antigenic peptides or proteins to elicit protective cellular immune responses against numerous pathogens. We generated two recombinant murine CMV (MCMV) vaccine vectors expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of influenza A virus (MCMVHA) or the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (MCMVS). A single injection of MCMVs expressing either viral protein induced potent neutralizing antibody responses, which strengthened over time. Importantly, MCMVHA-vaccinated mice were protected from illness following challenge with the influenza virus, and we excluded that this protection was due to the effects of memory T cells. Conclusively, we show here that MCMV vectors induce not only long-term cellular immunity but also humoral responses that provide long-term immune protection against clinically relevant respiratory pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据