4.7 Review

The use of supercytokines, immunocytokines, engager cytokines, and other synthetic cytokines in immunotherapy

期刊

CELLULAR & MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 192-209

出版社

CHIN SOCIETY IMMUNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/s41423-021-00786-6

关键词

Supercytokines; immunocytokines; engager cytokines; synthetic cytokines; immunotherapy

资金

  1. Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology Scientific Research Program [ZTXM20214003]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [82122055, 81872318]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [2108085J13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytokines play a critical role in immune regulation, but their clinical application is often limited by toxicity and lack of efficacy. Protein engineering and synthetic immunology provide new approaches to modify cytokine signaling and design engineered cytokines that selectively target specific cells.
Cytokines exert powerful immunomodulatory effects that are critical to physiology and pathology in humans. The application of natural cytokines in clinical studies has not been clearly established, and there are often problems associated with toxicity or lack of efficacy. The key reasons can be attributed to the pleiotropy of cytokine receptors and undesired activation of off-target cells. With a deeper understanding of the structural principles and functional signals of cytokine-receptor interactions, artificial modification of cytokine signaling through protein engineering and synthetic immunology has become an increasingly feasible and powerful approach. Engineered cytokines are designed to selectively target cells. Herein, the theoretical and experimental evidence of cytokine engineering is reviewed, and the supercytokines resulting from structural enhancement and the immunocytokines generated by antibody fusion are described. Finally, the engager cytokines formed by the crosslinking of cytokines and bispecific immune engagers and other synthetic cytokines formed by nonnatural analogs are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据