4.7 Article

Polysaccharide utilization loci in Bacteroides determine population fitness and community-level interactions

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 200-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.12.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R35GM124774]
  2. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [R01EB030340]
  3. Multi University Research Initiative (MURI) [W911NF-19-1-0269]
  4. Department of Energy [DE-FC02-07ER64494]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the role of polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) in Bacteroides uniformis (BU), showing that PULs enable glycan digestion and shape ecological dynamics. Using CRISPR-based genome editing, specific PULs are deleted to enhance BU fitness and colonization in the murine gut, modulated by glycan availability. PULs mediate glycan-dependent interactions with butyrate producers, affecting community dynamics and butyrate production.
Polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) are co-regulated bacterial genes that sense nutrients and enable glycan digestion. Human gut microbiome members, notably Bacteroides, contain numerous PULs that enable glycan utilization and shape ecological dynamics. To investigate the role of PULs on fitness and inter-species interactions, we develop a CRISPR-based genome editing tool to study 23 PULs in Bacteroides uniformis (BU). BU PULs show distinct glycan-degrading functions and transcriptional coordination that enables the population to adapt upon loss of other PULs. Exploiting a BU mutant barcoding strategy, we demonstrate that in vitro fitness and BU colonization in the murine gut are enhanced by deletion of specific PULs and modulated by glycan availability. PULs mediate glycan-dependent interactions with butyrate producers that depend on the degradation mechanism and glycan utilization ability of the butyrate producer. Thus, PULs determine community dynamics and butyrate production and provide a selective advantage or disadvantage depending on the nutritional landscape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据