4.7 Article

Strong humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 Spike after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination with a 16-week interval between doses

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 97-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.12.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministere de l'Economie et de l'Innovation du Quebec, Programme de soutien aux organismes de recherche et d'innovation
  2. Fondation du CHUM
  3. CIHR foundation grant [352417]
  4. CIHR [177958]
  5. Exceptional Fund COVID-19 from the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) [41027]
  6. Sentinelle COVID Quebec network
  7. CIHR COVID-19 rapid response grant [OV3 170632]
  8. CIHR stream 1 SARS-CoV-2 Variant Research
  9. Canada Research Chair on Retroviral Entry [RCHS0235 950-232424]
  10. FRQS Junior 1 salary award
  11. FRQS PhD fellowship
  12. CIHR PhD fellowship
  13. Department of Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunology of Universite de Montreal
  14. MITACS Accele ration postdoctoral fellowships
  15. Public Health Agency of Canada, through the Vaccine Surveillance Reference group
  16. Public Health Agency of Canada through the COVID19 Immunity Task Force

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that extending the interval between doses to 16 weeks significantly increased humoral responses in non-infected individuals, reaching similar levels as previously infected individuals. Compared to a shorter interval, a longer interval between vaccine doses resulted in stronger immune responses.
The standard regimen of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 includes two doses administered three weeks apart. However, some public health authorities spaced these doses, raising questions about efficacy. We analyzed longitudinal humoral responses against the D614G strain and variants of concern for SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of SARS-CoV-2-naive and previously infected individuals who received the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine with sixteen weeks between doses. While administering a second dose to previously infected individuals did not significantly improve humoral responses, these responses significantly increased in naive individuals after a 16-week spaced second dose, achieving similar levels as in previously infected individuals. Comparing these responses to those elicited in individuals receiving a short (4-week) dose interval showed that a 16-week interval induced more robust responses among naive vaccinees. These findings suggest that a longer interval between vaccine doses does not compromise efficacy and may allow greater flexibility in vaccine administration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据