4.7 Article

3β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase expressed by gut microbes degrades testosterone and is linked to depression in males

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 329-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.01.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0900400]
  2. Leading Talents of the Ten Thousand Talents Program
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1314600]
  4. Na-tional Natural Science Foundation of China [81571325, 81401117]
  5. Medical Science Advancement Program of Wuhan University [TFLC2018001]
  6. Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology Scientific Research Program [HSY89901038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Testosterone deficiency can lead to depressive symptoms, and gut microbes expressing 3β-HSD may be associated with depressive symptoms caused by testosterone degradation.
Testosterone deficiency can lead to depressive symptoms in humans; however, the causes of this deficiency are incompletely understood. Here, we isolated Mycobacterium neoaurum from the fecal samples of testosterone-deficient patients with depression and showed that this strain could degrade testosterone in vitro. Furthermore, gavaging rats with M. neoaurum reduced their serum and brain testosterone levels and induced depression-like behaviors. We identified the gene encoding 38-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3 beta-HSD) as the enzyme causing testosterone degradation. Introducing 3 beta-HSD into Escherichia coli enhanced its ability to degrade testosterone. Gavaging rats with 3 beta-HSD-producing E. coli reduced their serum and brain testosterone levels and caused depression-like behaviors. Finally, compared with 16.67% of participants without depression, 42.99% (46/107) of the fecal samples of patients with depression harbored 3 beta-HSD, and 60.87% (28/46) of these fecal samples expressed 3 beta-HSD. These results suggest that 3 beta-HSD expressed by gut microbes may be associated with depressive symptoms due to testosterone degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据