4.6 Article

Application of Clustering Methods for Online Tool Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis in High-Speed Milling Processes

期刊

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 721-732

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2425793

关键词

Clustering methods; condition monitoring; data mining; destructive test; fault diagnosis; flute cut separation; fuzzy C-Means clustering; high speed milling; online monitoring; prognosis; Vibration Analysis; wavelet analysis

资金

  1. Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR) Science and Engineering Research Council through the Singapore-Poland Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tool condition monitoring (TCM) is a necessary action in a high-speed milling (HSM) process. As a worn milling tool might irreversibly damage a workpiece, there is a vital demand for a TCM system to evaluate the tool wear progress, or equivalently the resultant surface roughness, nonintrusively. To build up a condition monitoring system for HSM processes, sensor signals are to be utilized to form a reference model that reflects the performance of the system. Therefore, a desired reference model has to apply more efficient feature extraction and artificial intelligence techniques to be more repeatable and generalizable. This paper illustrates the performance of clustering techniques on high-speed end milling experimental data. Studied clustering methods are applied to the wavelet features of force and vibration signals to illustrate the repeatability of their results. It is shown that clustering methods can coarsely capture the status of the process and can be applied for fault diagnosis and TCM purposes. It is also discussed how the application of clustering methods may improve the performance of existing reference models toward the more efficient utilization of available experimental data and to develop easily generalizable reference models. Finally, a possible application of clustering results is discussed comparing with state-of-the-art papers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据