4.6 Article

Autonomous Sampling of Water Columns Using Gliding Robotic Fish: Algorithms and Harmful-Algae-Sampling Experiments

期刊

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 1271-1281

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2458173

关键词

Environmental monitoring; field robotics; nonlinear control system; underwater vehicles

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IIS 0916720, IIS 1319602, IIP 1343413, CCF 1331852, ECCS 1446793]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1331852] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1446793] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1319602] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gliding robotic fish, which is a hybrid of underwater gliders and robotic fish, is energy efficient and highly maneuverable and holds strong promise for long-duration monitoring of underwater environments. In this paper, a novel scheme is proposed for autonomously sampling multiple water columns using gliding robotic fish. The scheme exploits energy-efficient spiral-down motion to sample each water column, followed by sagittal-plane glide-up toward the direction of the next water column. Once surfacing, the robot uses Global Positioning System guidance to reach the next column location through swimming. To enhance the path-tracking performance, a two-degree-of-freedom controller involving H-infinity control is used in the spiral motion, and a sliding-mode controller is employed to regulate the yaw angle during glide-up. The sampling scheme has been implemented on a gliding robotic fish prototype, Grace, and verified first in pool experiments and then in field experiments involving the sampling of harmful algae concentration in the Wintergreen Lake, Michigan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据