4.8 Article

Polybenzimidazole-derived carbon molecular sieve hollow fiber membranes with tailored oxygen selective transport

期刊

CARBON
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 71-83

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.033

关键词

Carbon molecular sieve (CMS) membrane; Hollow fiber membrane (HFM); Polybenzimidazole (PBI); Oxygen enrichment; Gas separation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymer membrane carbonization is a promising strategy for obtaining carbon molecular sieve (CMS) membrane materials with tailorable cavity size distributions. In this study, highly O-2 permselective CMS hollow fiber membranes (HFMs) derived from rigid PBI materials were fabricated and evaluated for O-2/N-2 separation performance.
Polymer membrane carbonization is a promising strategy to obtain carbon molecular sieve (CMS) membrane materials with tailorable cavity size distributions for high gas selectivities beyond that attained from traditional polymer membrane materials. Despite their already demonstrated exceptional separation performance characteristics for several gas separation applications (e.g. CO2/CH4 and H-2/CO2), further development of CMS membranes having high O-2/N-2 perm-selectivity for energy-efficient high-purity O-2 production has proven challenging. Herein, we explore CMS hollow fiber membranes (HFMs) derived from highly rigid and tightly-packed polybenzimidazole (PBI) materials. Nearly defect-free PBI-derived CMS HFMs were fabricated and evaluated for O-2/N-2 separation performance for the first time. The micro-structural and O-2 selective gas separation characteristics of PBI-CMS HFMs pyrolyzed at different pyrolysis conditions were intensively studied. With rigorous carbonization protocol optimization, we obtained highly O-2 permselective PBI-CMS HFMs having O-2/N-2 selectivities approaching 14, enabling high purity O-2 production. The PBI-CMS HFM O-2/N-2 separation performance dependence on operating conditions (e.g. temperature and feed pressure) are reported. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据