4.8 Article

Porous, thick nitrogen-doped carbon encapsulated large PtNi core-shell nanoparticles for oxygen reduction reaction with extreme stability and activity

期刊

CARBON
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 36-45

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.10.004

关键词

Nitrogen-doped carbon layer; Large Pt particle; Encapsulated electrocatalyst; Oxygen reduction reaction; H-2-O-2 fuel cell

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Social Development Project of Zhenjiang City [GY2018002]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundations [2018M630530, 2019T120410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By encapsulating large Pt shell/Ni core particles with thick and porous nitrogen-doped carbon layers, excellent stability and high activity of the composite catalyst were achieved, maintaining high oxygen reduction activity value even after a large number of cyclic voltammetry cycles.
We encapsulate large Pt shell/Ni core (PtNi) particles with thick and porous nitrogen-doped carbon (N-C) layers, and demonstrate that the thick N-C layers can protect the PtNi particles from dissolution and migration for an extremely long service life through both steric hindrance and chemical bond; in addition, the well mass transfer performance of the porous N-C, the thin Pt shell, and the promotion effects of N-C and Ni on Pt lead to excellent activity of the composite catalyst (N-C/PtNi). As a result, the N-C/PtNi keeps the high oxygen reduction reaction activity value of 962-1080 mA mg(Pt)(-1) for 60,000 cyclic voltammetry (CV) cycles and still has a high activity of 265 mA mg(Pt)(-1) even after 120,000 CV cycles. Moreover, the N-C/PtNi shows a max power density of 1.24 W cm(-2) at cathodic loading of 0.1 mg(Pt) cm(-2) in H-2-O-2 fuel cell under 200 kPa absolute pressure of O-2 without performance decrease within 60,000 cycles. Other large noble metal-based particles are believed to gain ultrahigh stabilities and higher activities through performing the similar encapsulation. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据