4.7 Article

Multi-functional nanocellulose-chitosan dressing loaded with antibacterial lawsone for rapid hemostasis and cutaneous wound healing

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118482

关键词

Chitosan; Nanocellulose; Lawsone; Antibacterial; Hemostasis; Wound healing

资金

  1. Korea Forest Service, National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2015R1A6A1A03032522]
  2. Soonchunhyang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of a biomaterial with hemostatic antibacterial features for controlled delivery of lawsone during wound healing was explored. It showed faster degradation and release of lawsone in acidic pH conditions, and demonstrated efficacy in promoting hemostasis and wound closure in a rat model, suggesting potential for functional wound healing applications.
Cutaneous wounds accompanied by massive bleeding, bacterial infections might be lethal and cause fundamental therapeutic impediments in clinical fields. As part of the push for a solution, biomaterial having hemostatic antibacterial features is highly desirable. Inspired by this concept, freeze dried sponges were developed followed by combining tempo-oxidized nanocellulose (TOCN), chitosan using EDC/NHS cross-linker with antibacterial lawsone loading for controlled delivery of this compound during wound healing. The pore diameter decreased upon increasing chitosan (2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5% w/v) while TOCN ensured scaffold's mechanical stability. The in vitro degradation, lawsone release from fibroblast cell-compatible sponge was faster in acidic pH 5.5 than physiologic pH 7.4 indicating adaptability to physiological skin milieu of wounds. The rat tail amputation model, 14 days rat full-thickness cutaneous-wound model ensured hemostasis, dramatic wound closure after TLC4.5 (optimized scaffold) treatment suggesting its potential as functional wound healing substitute showing obvious avenue for hemostatis and skin tissue reconstruction arena.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据