4.7 Article

Influence of TEMPO oxidation on the properties of ethylene glycol methyl ether acrylate grafted cellulose sponges

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118458

关键词

Sponges; TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers; Ethylene glycol methyl ether acrylate

资金

  1. Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI -UEFISCDI, within PNCDI III [67TE/2020]
  2. ERDF/COP 2014-2020 [P_36_611, 107066 -INOVABIOMED]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cellulose nanofibers (CNF) obtained through high-pressure microfluidization were oxidized with 2,6,6-tetra-methylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) to facilitate the grafting of ethylene glycol methyl ether acrylate (EGA). The analysis showed a more efficient grafting of EGA oligomers on the surface of TOCNF, resulting in increased hydrophobicity and reduced porosity. Despite a similar swelling ratio to original CNF grafted with EGA, TOCNF-EGA demonstrated good cytocompatibility and compression strength, making it suitable for applications in regenerative medicine.
In this study, cellulose nanofibers (CNF) obtained via high-pressure microfluidization were 2,6,6-tetra-methylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) oxidized (TOCNF) in order to facilitate the grafting of ethylene glycol methyl ether acrylate (EGA). FTIR and XPS analyses revealed a more efficient grafting of EGA oligomers on the surface of TOCNF as compared to the original CNF. As a result, a consistent covering of the TOCNF fibers with EGA oligomers, an increased hydrophobicity and a reduction in porosity were noticed for TOCNF-EGA. However, the swelling ratio of TOCNF-EGA was similar to that of original CNF grafted with EGA and higher than that of TOCNF, because the higher amount of grafted EGA onto oxidized cellulose and the looser structure reduced the contacts between the fibrils and increased the absorption of water. All these results corroborated with a good cytocompatibility and compression strength recommend TOCNF-EGA for applications in regenerative medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据