4.7 Article

Structural characterization and intestinal protection activity of polysaccharides from Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) berries

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118648

关键词

Sea buckthorn; Polysaccharides; Structure; Drosophila melanogaster; Antioxidant activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41406142]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [LGF19D06004, LQ18D060005, LGN18D060002]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Zhoushan of China [2019C21015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel heteropolysaccharide fraction (SP0.1-1) was isolated from Sea buckthorn berries, with a specific composition and structure. Supplementing with SP0.1-1 extended fruit flies' lifespan, enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities, and reduced oxidative damage, showing potential for sea buckthorn polysaccharide products development.
The sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) berries are rich in various bioactive components and widely used as fruit and traditional medicine. In this study, a novel heteropolysaccharide fraction (SP0.1-1) was isolated from Sea buckthorn berries. SP0.1-1 is composed of mannose, glucose, galactose, and arabinose in the molar ratio of 1:2.3:1.9:11.2 with a core structure containing 1,4-linked-alpha-D-Glcp, 1,4,6-linked-alpha-D-Glcp and 1,4-linked-alpha-DManp residues as the backbone. And the side-chains comprised of 1,3,5-linked-alpha-L-Araf, 1,5-linked-alpha-L-Araf, terminal alpha-Araf and 1,4-linked-beta-D-Galp. Furthermore, a diet supplemented with SP0.1-1 extended the mean lifespan, enhanced antioxidant enzyme (superoxide dismutase, SOD; glutathione peroxidase, GSH-Px; and catalase, CAT) activities, and decreased the malondialdehyde (MDA) level and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)induced mortality rate in fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster). To summarize, the study's findings will provide evidence for the development of sea buckthorn polysaccharide products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据