4.7 Article

Nanocellulose-enhanced organohydrogel with high-strength, conductivity, and anti-freezing properties for wearable strain sensors

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 277, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118872

关键词

Cellulose; Mechanical performance; Ionic conductivity; Anti-freezing; Strain sensor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32171692]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2572020DR13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, high-strength, transparent, conductive, and anti-freezing organohydrogels were prepared through radical polymerization. These organohydrogels exhibited high strength, stretchability, and ionic conductivity, and remained flexible and conductive at low temperatures.
The use of ion-conductive hydrogels in strain sensors with high mechanical properties, conductivity, and antifreezing properties is challenging. Here, high-strength, transparent, conductive, and anti-freezing organohydrogels were fabricated through the radical polymerization of polyacrylamide (PAM)/sodium alginate (SA)/ TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils (TOCNs) in a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)/water solution, followed by soaking in a CaCl2 solution. The resulting organohydrogels demonstrated a high strength (tensile strength of 1.04 MPa), stretchability (681%), transparency (>84% transmittance), and ionic conductivity (1.25 S m-1). The organohydrogel-based strain sensor showed a high strain sensitivity (GF = 2.1). In addition, due to a synergistic effect between the DMSO/H2O binary solvent and CaCl2, the organohydrogel remained flexible (could bend 180 degrees) and conductive (1.01 S m-1) at -20 degrees C. Interestingly, the TOCNs exerted a reinforcing effect on both the mechanical properties and ionic conductivity. This research provides a novel strategy to prepare ion-conductive organohydrogels with good mechanical properties, conductivity, and anti-freezing properties for use as flexible electronic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据