4.7 Article

PCNA inhibition enhances the cytotoxicity of β-lapachone in NQO1-Positive cancer cells by augmentation of oxidative stress-induced DNA damage

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 519, 期 -, 页码 304-314

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.07.040

关键词

NQO1; PCNA; T2AA; Combination chemotherapy; beta-Lapachone

类别

资金

  1. NIH [CA221158, CA224493, CA240952]
  2. IU Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center [P30CA082709]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates a novel combination therapy of beta-lapachone and PCNA inhibitor T2AA that synergistically targets NQO1(+) cancer cells to prevent DNA repair, increase cell death, and enhance antitumor efficacy.
beta-Lapachone is a classic quinone-containing antitumor NQO1-bioactivatable drug that directly kills NQO1-overexpressing cancer cells. However, the clinical applications of beta-lapachone are primarily limited by its high toxicity and modest lethality. To overcome this side effect and expand the therapeutic utility of beta-lapachone, we demonstrate the effects of a novel combination therapy including beta-lapachone and the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) inhibitor T2 amino alcohol (T2AA) on various NQO1(+) cancer cells. PCNA has DNA clamp processivity activity mediated by encircling double-stranded DNA to recruit proteins involved in DNA replication and DNA repair. In this study, we found that compared to monotherapy, a nontoxic dose of the T2AA synergized with a sublethal dose of beta-lapachone in an NQO1-dependent manner and that combination therapy prevented DNA repair, increased double-strand break (DSB) formation and promoted programmed necrosis and G1 phase cell cycle arrest. We further determined that combination therapy enhanced antitumor efficacy and prolonged survival in Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) xenografts model. Our findings show novel evidence for a new therapeutic approach that combines of beta-lapachone treatment with PCNA inhibition that is highly effective in treating NQO1(+) solid tumor cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据