4.6 Article

Experimental investigation of unconsolidated undrained shear behaviour of peat

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-021-02541-7

关键词

Peat; Shear behaviour; Stiffness degradation

资金

  1. Irish Centre for Research in Applied Geosciences (iCRAG)
  2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  3. School of Engineering in University College Cork
  4. Hebei University of Technology [2017HW0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the undrained shear behavior of peat and reveals the degradation of shear stiffness. The undrained deviatoric shear resistance of peat continuously increases with increasing shear strain but does not show a distinct peak strength. The shear stiffness of peat specimens degrades significantly with increasing shear strain. A relationship model between the normalized shear stiffness and the normalized shear strain is proposed.
This study conducted a series of standard classifications to determine the physical properties of peat, followed by 28 unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests to investigate undrained peat shear behaviour. Results show that the undrained deviatoric shear resistance of peat grows continuously with increasing shear strain, but ends up with no obvious peak strength even at very large strain (i.e. 25%). The shear stiffness of peat specimens degrades substantially with increasing shear strain. To make the stiffness of peat specimens comparable, the secant shear modulus G is then normalized with the shear modulus G(0.1%) at relatively small strain of 0.1%. Furthermore, results from 16 previous unconsolidated undrained tests and 66 consolidated undrained tests available in literature were taken into account together with 28 lab test data obtained in this study, aiming to reveal the general behaviour of peat shear stiffness degradation. For all the test data, the shear strain gamma is normalized with a reference strain gamma(ref,0.1%), at which the stiffness G/G(0.1%) = 0.5. A hyperbolic function is then adopted to fit the relationship between the normalised stiffness versus the normalised shear strain. Over 78% of the data falls within a +/- 30% margin within 5% shear strain, while the predicted stiffness out of the margin is usually underestimated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据