4.6 Article

Engineering properties of used motor oil-contaminated soil treated by sawdust and fiber

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-022-02617-y

关键词

Sawdust; Contaminated soil; Engineering properties; Cheap remediation; Fiber reinforcement; Soil treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the hydro-mechanical properties of sawdust-treated hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Experimental tests show that sawdust treatment has a positive influence on shear strength but a negative influence on unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and water conductivity. Fiber-reinforced mixtures of sawdust-treated soils display better shear response, higher UCS, and increased conductivity.
One of the methods that is proved adequate and is still under study today is the treatment of hydrocarbon-contaminated materials by using bio-based agents such as sawdust. Despite the numerous studies on the remedial effect of sawdust on the soil, never have the engineering properties of sawdust-treated hydrocarbon-contaminated soils been investigated. Studying such properties is of great importance when it comes to construction over the treated grounds. In this study, the hydro-mechanical properties of a used motor oil (UMO)-contaminated soil treated by five different sawdust contents are evaluated through a complete set of experimental tests, namely standard compaction, direct shear, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and falling-head conductivity tests. Since the results of the tests showed a degradation in UCS as a result of sawdust treatment, four different percentages of fibers were added to the treated soil and the same tests were conducted again. The results show a positive influence of sawdust on the shear strength, a negative influence on the UCS, and a major reduction in water conductivity. Fiber-reinforced sawdust-treated mixtures display a better shear response, a higher UCS, and an increased conductivity. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images also prove the efficacy of sawdust treatment in soil remediation and improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据