4.7 Article

Autoencoder-driven fault detection and diagnosis in building automation systems: Residual-based and latent space-based approaches

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108066

关键词

Autoencoder; Building automation systems (BAS); Fault detection and diagnosis (FDD); Residual-based; Latent space-based; District heating system

资金

  1. Research Assistance Program (2020) in the Incheon National University
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2019R1F1A1060834]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1F1A1060834] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposed fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) methods based on autoencoders (AE) and compared the performance of different models quantitatively. It was found that the dimensionality of the AE latent space and the type of diagnosis models can affect the performance of FDD.
Recently, data-driven fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) technologies have been studied extensively to detect the fault status early and maintain the health of building automation systems (BASs). Among the various algorithms for building FDD systems, an autoencoder (AE) is widely used as an unsupervised deep-learning method. Conventional AE-based FDD methods can use two types of information generated from the novel structure of the AE: (1) residual matrix (REM) and (2) latent space matrix (LSM). However, fundamental discussions about AE structures are rare, and the uses of the REM and LSM for building FDD models have seldom been compared. In this study, AE-based FDD methods are suggested. Quantitative comparisons were conducted under the designed fault conditions and real operational faults (hunting). AE-based fault detection models were designed using the AE latent space dimensionality. For fault diagnosis models, REM- and LSM-based models were used. Each model was then subdivided by the AE latent space dimensions. The detection model performances showed no meaningful differences according to the designed cases. However, for the diagnosis models, the performance of the LSM-based models was 14.4% better than that of the REM-based models. Additionally, the dimensions of the latent space caused the model performance to vary as much as 21.5%. Two main issues-training data dependency and latent space dimensionality-were found and investigated to improve the performance of AE-based FDD. Modeling guidelines are suggested based on the findings. These are valuable for successful FDD application with limited working sensors and datasets in real BASs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据