4.4 Article

Objective scoring of footpad dermatitis in broiler chickens using image segmentation and a deep learning approach: camera-based scoring system

期刊

BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 63, 期 4, 页码 427-433

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2021.2013439

关键词

Welfare; deep learning; footpad dermatitis; image segmentation; broiler chicken; camera-based scoring system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Footpad dermatitis (FPD) can be automatically determined based on chicken foot images using a novel deep learning approach. The approach achieved high accuracy and performed well for all FPD scores, demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing subjective bias in manual scoring.
1. Footpad dermatitis (FPD) can be used as an important indicator of animal welfare and for economic evaluation; however, human scoring is subjective, biased and labour intensive. This paper proposes a novel deep learning approach that can automatically determine the severity of FPD based on images of chicken's feet. 2. This approach first determined the areas of the FPD lesion, normal parts of each foot and the background, using a deep segmentation model. The proportion of the FPD for the chicken's two feet was calculated by dividing the number of FPD pixels by the number of feet pixels. The proportion was then categorised using a five-point score for FPD. The approach was evaluated from 244 images of the left and right footpads using five-fold cross-validation. These images were collected at a commercial slaughter plant and scored by trained observers. 3. The result showed that this approach achieved an overall accuracy and a macro F1-score of 0.82. The per-class F1-scores from all FPD scores (scores 0 to 4) were similar (0.85, 0.80, 0,80, 0,80, and 0.87, respectively), which demonstrated that this approach performed equally well for all classes of scores. 4. The results suggested that image segmentation and a deep learning approach can be used to automate the process of scoring FPD based on chicken foot images, which can help to minimise the subjective bias inherent in manual scoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据