4.6 Article

Exercise prehabilitation during neoadjuvant chemotherapy may enhance tumour regression in oesophageal cancer: results from a prospective non-randomised trial

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 56, 期 7, 页码 402-+

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104243

关键词

rehabilitation; physical activity; prospective studies

资金

  1. Guy's and St Thomas' Charity, London [EFT 150709]
  2. Centre for Health and Human Performance, London

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the effects of a structured prehabilitation exercise intervention with conventional best-practice in the treatment of esophageal cancer patients. The results showed that the exercise intervention group had better tumor regression and downstaging, suggesting the need for larger studies on this topic.
Background There is increasing evidence for the use of exercise in cancer patients and data supporting enhanced tumour volume reduction following chemotherapy in animal models. To date, there is no reported histopathological evidence of a similar oncological benefit in oesophageal cancer. Methods A prospective non-randomised trial compared a structured prehabilitation exercise intervention during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery versus conventional best-practice for oesophageal cancer patients. Biochemical and body composition analyses were performed at multiple time points. Outcome measures included radiological and pathological markers of disease regression. Logistic regression calculated ORs with 95% CI for the likelihood of pathological response adjusting for chemotherapy regimen and chemotherapy delivery. Results Comparison of the Intervention (n=21) and Control (n=19) groups indicated the Intervention group had higher rates of tumour regression (Mandard TRG 1-3 Intervention n=15/20 (75%) vs Control n=7/19 (36.8%) p=0.025) including adjusted analyses (OR 6.57; 95% CI 1.52 to 28.30). Combined tumour and node downstaging (Intervention n=9 (42.9%) vs Control n=3 (15.8%) p=0.089) and Fat Free Mass index were also improved (Intervention 17.8 vs 18.7 kg/m(2); Control 16.3 vs 14.7 kg/m(2), p=0.026). Differences in markers of immunity (CD-3 and CD-8) and inflammation (IL-6, VEGF, INF-y, TNFa, MCP-1 and EGF) were observed. Conclusion The results suggest improved tumour regression and downstaging in the exercise intervention group and should prompt larger studies on this topic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据