4.6 Article

Effect of time to relapse on overall survival in patients with mantle cell lymphoma following autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 195, 期 5, 页码 757-763

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17865

关键词

mantle cell lymphoma; autologous transplant; time to relapse; dynamic landmark analysis

资金

  1. Public Health Service from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) [U24CA076518]
  2. Public Health Service from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  3. Public Health Service from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  4. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) [HHSH250201700006C]
  5. Office of Naval Research [N00014-20-1-2705, N00014-20-1-2832]
  6. Be the Match Foundation
  7. Medical College of Wisconsin
  8. National Marrow Donor Program
  9. AbbVie
  10. Accenture
  11. Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  12. Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation
  13. Adienne SA
  14. Allovir, Inc.
  15. Amgen, Inc.
  16. Astellas Pharma US
  17. bluebird bio, inc.
  18. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
  19. CareDx
  20. CSL Behring
  21. CytoSen Therapeutics, Inc.
  22. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.
  23. Eurofins Viracor
  24. ExcellThera
  25. Fate Therapeutics
  26. Gamida Cell, Ltd.
  27. Genentech Inc
  28. Gilead
  29. GlaxoSmithKline
  30. Incyte Corporation
  31. Janssen/Johnson Johnson
  32. Jasper Therapeutics
  33. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  34. Karyopharm Therapeutics
  35. Kiadis Pharma
  36. Kite, a Gilead Company
  37. Kyowa Kirin
  38. Magenta Therapeutics
  39. Medac GmbH
  40. Merck Co.
  41. Millennium, the Takeda Oncology Co.
  42. Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.
  43. MorphoSys
  44. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  45. Omeros Corporation
  46. Oncopeptides, Inc.
  47. Orca Biosystems, Inc.
  48. Pfizer, Inc.
  49. Pharmacyclics, LLC
  50. Sanofi Genzyme
  51. Seagen, Inc.
  52. Stemcyte
  53. Takeda Pharmaceuticals
  54. Tscan
  55. Vertex
  56. Vor Biopharma
  57. Xenikos BV

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In young and fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma, intensive induction therapy followed by autologous haematopoietic cell transplant is the standard care. Time to relapse after autoHCT has a significant impact on overall survival, with early relapse defining a high-risk group with inferior post-relapse survival. This study highlights the importance of considering novel therapeutic approaches for MCL patients suffering early relapse after upfront autoHCT.
In young and fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), intensive induction therapy followed by a consolidative autologous haematopoietic cell transplant (autoHCT) is the standard of care in the front-line setting. Recently, time-to-event analysis has emerged as an important risk assessment tool in lymphoma, though its impact in MCL is not well defined. We utilized the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database to evaluate the effect of post-autoHCT time to relapse on overall survival (OS) over time in 461 patients who underwent autoHCT within 12 months of MCL diagnosis. On multivariate analysis, the impact of relapse on OS was greatest at the six-month [hazard ratio (HR) = 7 center dot 68], 12-month (HR = 6 center dot 68), and 18-month (HR = 5 center dot 81) landmark timepoints. Using a dynamic landmark model we demonstrate that adjusted OS at five years following each landmark timepoint improved with time for relapsing and non-relapsing patients. Furthermore, early relapse (<18 months) following autoHCT defines a high-risk group with inferior post-relapse OS. This retrospective analysis highlights the impact of time to relapse on OS in MCL patients undergoing up-front autoHCT and emphasizes the need to consider novel therapeutic approaches for patients suffering early relapse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据