4.5 Review

One hundred years since insulin discovery: An update on current and future perspectives for pharmacotherapy of diabetes mellitus

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 88, 期 4, 页码 1598-1612

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15100

关键词

diabetes; insulin therapy; pharmacotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery and commercial availability of insulins revolutionized the treatment of diabetes mellitus. With the increasing prevalence of the disease, there is ongoing research and development of new drugs targeting novel mechanisms to improve efficacy and reduce adverse effects. Some of these newer drugs have shown promising results in recent clinical trials and may potentially change the landscape of diabetes treatment.
Diabetes mellitus was considered a fatal malady until the discovery, extraction and commercial availability of insulins. Numerous other classes of drugs ranging from sulfonylureas to sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors were then marketed. However, with the prevalence of diabetes mellitus increasing every year, many more drugs and therapies are under investigation. This review article aimed to summarize the significant developments in the pharmacotherapy of diabetes mellitus and outline the progress made by the recent advances, 100 years since insulins were first extracted successfully. Insulin analogues and insulin delivery pumps have further improved glycaemic control in diabetes mellitus. Cardiovascular and renal outcome trials have changed the landscape of diabetology, with some of these drugs also efficacious in nondiabetics. Newer drug delivery systems are being evaluated to improve the efficacy and reduce the dosing frequency and adverse effects of antidiabetics. Some newer drugs with novel mechanisms of action targeting type 1 and type 2 diabetes have also shown promise in recent clinical trials. These drugs include dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide 1-agonists, glucokinase activators, anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies and glimins. Their efficacy needs to be evaluated in larger studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据