4.7 Article

Multicenter randomised trial of two versus three courses of preoperative cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 126, 期 11, 页码 1555-1562

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01726-5

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared the efficacy of two versus three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treating locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and found no significant differences in terms of R0 resection rates, pN0 rates, and 2-year progression-free survival rates. Only patients aged under 65 years old showed a tendency for better survival with the three-course treatment.
Background The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles remains to be established for treating oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We compared two versus three courses of NAC for treating locally advanced ESCC in a multi-institutional, randomised, Phase II trial. Methods We randomly assigned 180 patients with locally advanced ESCC at 6 institutions to either two (N = 91) or three (N = 89) courses of DCF (docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, fluorouracil 700 mg/m(2) continuous infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks, prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) with an intention-to-treat analysis. Results Patient background parameters were well-balanced. The R0 resection rates were 98.9 and 96.5% in the two- and three-course groups, respectively (P = 0.830). In resected cases, the two- and three-course groups had comparable pN0 rates (P = 0.225) and histological responses (P = 0.898). The 2-year PFS rate was also comparable between the two groups (71.4 vs. 71.1%, P = 0.669). Among subgroups based on baseline characteristics, only patients aged under 65 years old showed a tendency for better survival with the three-course treatment (hazard ratio = 2.612, 95% confidence interval: 1.012-7.517). Conclusions Two courses of a DCF regimen showed potential as an optional NAC treatment for locally advanced ESCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据