4.7 Review

Faecal immunochemical test for patients with 'high-risk' bowel symptoms: a large prospective cohort study and updated literature review

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 126, 期 5, 页码 736-743

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01653-x

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NHS England Cancer Alliance programme
  2. North London Partners in Health and Care (North Central London's Sustainability and transformation partnership)
  3. NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Cancer Research UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that using FIT as a tool to rule out CRC comes with a certain miss rate, but combining it with other indicators such as anemia and abdominal pain can reduce the risk of missing cases. FIT can help concentrate medical resources on the most at-risk CRC patients, but further research on safety netting is needed before incorporating FIT triage into the diagnostic pathway.
Background We evaluated whether faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) among patients presenting with 'high-risk' symptoms requiring definitive investigation. Methods Three thousand five hundred and ninety-six symptomatic patients referred to the standard urgent CRC pathway were recruited in a multi-centre observational study. They completed FIT in addition to standard investigations. CRC miss rate (percentage of CRC cases with low quantitative faecal haemoglobin [f-Hb] measurement) and specificity (percentage of patients without cancer with low f-Hb) were calculated. We also provided an updated literature review. Results Ninety patients had CRC. At f-Hb < 10 mu g/g, the miss rate was 16.7% (specificity 80.1%). At f-Hb < 4 mu g/g, the miss rate was 12.2% (specificity 73%), which became 3.3% if low FIT plus the absence of anaemia and abdominal pain were considered (specificity 51%). Within meta-analyses of 9 UK studies, the pooled miss rate was 7.2% (specificity 74%) for f-Hb < 4 mu g/g. Discussion FIT alone as a triage tool would miss an estimated 1 in 8 cases in our study (1 in 14 from meta-analysis), while many people without CRC could avoid investigations. FIT can focus secondary care diagnostic capacity on patients most at risk of CRC, but more work on safety netting is required before incorporating FIT triage into the urgent diagnostic pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据