4.1 Article

Synthesis of a KIT-6 mesoporous sulfonic acid catalyst to produce biodiesel from cashew nut oil

期刊

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 1001-1011

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s43153-021-00216-0

关键词

Transesterification; Biodiesel; Cashew nut oil; Butanol; KIT-6

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001 (PROEX 23038.000509/2020-82)]
  2. CAPES/INL
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [307837/2017-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a sulfonic acid-functionalized KIT-6 silica catalyst was prepared and applied to the transesterification of Brazilian cashew nut oil with butanol. The catalyst was characterized to confirm its structural integrity and ordered structure. The catalyst exhibited high catalytic activity and good recyclability under certain conditions.
In this work, KIT-6 silica functionalized with sulfonic acid by the co-condensation method was prepared and evaluated as a catalyst in the transesterification of Brazilian cashew nut oil (BCNO) with butanol for biodiesel synthesis. The catalyst was characterized by SAXS, TEM, N-2 adsorption-desorption measurements, Si-29 MAS NMR and C-13 CP-MAS NMR to prove the structural integrity of the incorporated organic group and to show the ordered structure, morphology and porosity, respectively. Small-angle XRD confirmed the formation of the mesophase of the synthesized materials. TEM images demonstrated the well-ordered arrangement of the pores and their uniformity throughout the grains, in addition to the highly ordered nature of the cubic mesostructures. The KIT-6 propylsulfonic acid catalyst was able to produce a 70% butyl ester yield, as determined by H-1 NMR spectroscopy in 6 h reaction with a BuOH/BCNO molar ratio of 30:1, 140 degrees C and a 6 wt% of catalyst mass relative to starting oil mass in the reaction. The KIT-6-S catalyst can be reused for two cycles without loss of catalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据