4.7 Article

Motor neuron pathology in CANVAS due to RFC1 expansions

期刊

BRAIN
卷 145, 期 6, 页码 2121-2132

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab449

关键词

sensory neuronopathy; CANVAS; cerebellar ataxia; motor neuron; parkinsonism

资金

  1. VERUM foundation
  2. Investissements d'avenir [ANR-11-INBS-0011]
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/T001712/1]
  4. Fondazione CARIPLO [2019-1836]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CANVAS caused by RFC1 biallelic expansions is a major cause of inherited sensory neuronopathy. Detection of RFC1 expansion is challenging and CANVAS can be associated with atypical features. In this study, we clinically and genetically characterized 50 patients and found that most of them carried a biallelic expansion in RFC1. In addition to the core CANVAS phenotype, we observed several atypical features such as chronic cough, oculomotor signs, motor neuron involvement, dysautonomia, and parkinsonism. We also propose new guidelines for the screening of RFC1 expansion.
CANVAS caused by RFC1 biallelic expansions is a major cause of inherited sensory neuronopathy. Detection of RFC1 expansion is challenging and CANVAS can be associated with atypical features. We clinically and genetically characterized 50 patients, selected based on the presence of sensory neuronopathy confirmed by EMG. We screened RFC1 expansion by PCR, repeat-primed PCR, and Southern blotting of long-range PCR products, a newly developed method. Neuropathological characterization was performed on the brain and spinal cord of one patient. Most patients (88%) carried a biallelic (AAGGG)(n) expansion in RFC1. In addition to the core CANVAS phenotype (sensory neuronopathy, cerebellar syndrome and vestibular impairment), we observed chronic cough (97%), oculomotor signs (85%), motor neuron involvement (55%), dysautonomia (50%), and parkinsonism (10%). Motor neuron involvement was found for 24 of 38 patients (63.1%). First motor neuron signs, such as brisk reflexes, extensor plantar responses, and/or spasticity, were present in 29% of patients, second motor neuron signs, such as fasciculations, wasting, weakness, or a neurogenic pattern on EMG in 18%, and both in 16%. Mixed motor and sensory neuronopathy was observed in 19% of patients. Among six non-RFC1 patients, one carried a heterozygous AAGGG expansion and a pathogenic variant in GRM1. Neuropathological examination of one RFC1 patient with an enriched phenotype, including parkinsonism, dysautonomia, and cognitive decline, showed posterior column and lumbar posterior root atrophy. Degeneration of the vestibulospinal and spinocerebellar tracts was mild. We observed marked astrocytic gliosis and axonal swelling of the synapse between first and second motor neurons in the anterior horn at the lumbar level. The cerebellum showed mild depletion of Purkinje cells, with empty baskets, torpedoes, and astrogliosis characterized by a disorganization of the Bergmann's radial glia. We found neuronal loss in the vagal nucleus. The pars compacta of the substantia nigra was depleted, with widespread Lewy bodies in the locus coeruleus, substantia nigra, hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and amygdala. We propose new guidelines for the screening of RFC1 expansion, considering different expansion motifs. Here, we developed a new method to more easily detect pathogenic RFC1 expansions. We report frequent motor neuron involvement and different neuronopathy subtypes. Parkinsonism was more prevalent in this cohort than in the general population, 10% versus the expected 1% (P < 0.001). We describe, for the first time, the spinal cord pathology in CANVAS, showing the alteration of posterior columns and roots, astrocytic gliosis and axonal swelling, suggesting motor neuron synaptic dysfunction. Huin, Coarelli et al. present a cohort of 50 patients with sensory neuronopathy, including 44 cases of CANVAS caused by RFC1 expansions. They introduce a new method for detecting RFC1 expansions, report frequent motor neuron involvement or parkinsonism, and describe for the first time the spinal cord pathology in CANVAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据