4.3 Article

Fabrication and characterization of high entropy pyrochlore ceramics

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bsecv.2021.11.002

关键词

High-entropy ceramics; Pyrochlore structure; Densification; Crystal structure prediction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-entropy rare-earth zirconates were successfully fabricated through pressureless and spark plasma sintering. Crystalline ceramics were obtained after glycine nitrate procedure and subsequent calcination. The coexistence of defective fluorite and crystal pyrochlore structures was observed during calcination, but pure crystalline pyrochlore formed after sintering at 1450 degrees C.
High-entropy rare-earth (RE) zirconates with pyrochlore structure were successfully fab-ricated by pressureless and spark plasma sintering. RE2Zr2O7 compound with nominal composition (La0.2Y0.2Gd0.2Nd0.2Sm0.2)Zr2O7 was prepared by simple glycine nitrate pro-cedure (GNP). GNP process yielded powders with low crystallinity and after subsequent calcination, well crystalline ceramics were formed. During calcination defective fluorite (F-RE2Zr2O7) and crystal pyrochlore (Py-RE2Zr2O7) structures coexist. Formation of pure crystalline pyrochlore occurs after sintering at 1450 degrees C. High-density ceramics, free of any additives, were obtained after powders compaction and pressureless (PS), as well as field assisted sintering technique (FAST) at 1450 degrees C. Theoretical investigations of the high-entropy RE2Zr2O7 pyrochlore systems were performed. Unit cell parameter of the obtained Py-RE2Zr2O7 is 10.5892(2) Aand 10.5999(2) A for PS and FAST sintering, respectively, which is in good agreement with the results of Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. The ther-mal diffusivity of sintered samples at room temperature was similar to 0.7 mm2/s for both sintering methods.(c) 2021 SECV. Published by Elsevier Espa n similar to a, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据