4.6 Article

SAG3 Toxoplasma gondii cloning reveals unexpected fivefold infection in the blood of feral cats in the Mexican Caribbean

期刊

BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-021-03129-9

关键词

Toxoplasma gondii; Genotyping; Feral cats; Mixed infections; Mexican Southeast; Cloning

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) [A1-S-21955, 2012/013, 2020/039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified multiple genotypes of T. gondii in the blood of feral cats in southeastern Mexico, suggesting a high genetic diversity of the parasite in felines in this region. The cloning and sequencing process revealed six different SAG3 sequences, with some showing intragenic recombination and unique genetic patterns not shared with globally reported sequences.
Background Currently, more than 300 genotypes of Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) have been described throughout the world, demonstrating its wide genetic diversity. The SAG3 locus is one of the genes included in the genotyping panel of this parasite. It is associated with its virulence since it participates during the invasion process of the host cells. Therefore, cloning, sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis were used to deepen the understanding of the SAG3 locus genetic diversity of T. gondii in blood samples from feral cats. Results Six different SAG3 sequences were detected, five of which were detected in one feline. Three sequences were first reported here; one of them was an intragenic recombinant. In the cladogram, four out of ten SAG3 sequences did not share nodes with others reported worldwide. Conclusions Cloning and sequencing of samples with more than one restriction pattern by PCR-RFLP were very helpful tools to demonstrate the presence of more than three genotypes of T. gondii in the blood of feral cats from southeastern Mexico. This suggests a potential mixed infection of multiple T. gondii strains and high genetic diversity of the parasites in felines in this tropical region of Mexico.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据