Explaining the adoption and use of computed tomography and magnetic resonance image technologies in public hospitals

Objective This article examines what the adoption and use of advanced medical technologies - computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - by public hospitals depend on and to what extent. Methods From a sample of panel data for all public hospitals in the health service of Galicia (a subregion of the Galicia-North of Portugal Euroregion) for the 2010-2017 period, we grouped explanatory variables into inputs (resources), outputs (activities) and socio-demographic variables. Factor analysis was used to reduce as much as possible the number of analysed variables, discriminant analysis to examine the technologies adoption decision, and multiple regression analysis to investigate their use. Results Factor analysis identified motivators on adoption and use of CT and MRI medical technologies as follows: hospital inputs/outputs (Factor 1); radiology studies and adoption of CT by public hospitals (Factor 2); research/teaching role and big-ticket diagnostic and therapeutic (lithotripsy) technologies (Factor 3); number of transplants (Factor 4); cancer diagnosis/treatment (Factor 5); and catchment area geographical dispersion (Factor 6). Cronbach's alpha of 0.881 indicated an acceptable degree of reliability of the factor variables. Regarding adoption of these technologies, Factor 1 is the most influential, explaining 37% of the variance and showing adequate global internal consistency, whereas Factor 2 is limited to 13% of the variance. In the discriminant analysis, values for Box's M test and canonical correlations such as Wilks's lambda for the two technologies underpin the reliability and predictive capacity of the discriminant equations. Finally, and according to the regression analysis, the factor with the greatest influence on CT and MRI use is Factor 2, followed by Factors 1 and 3 in the case of CT use, and Factors 3 and 5 in the case of MRI use. Conclusion CT and MRI adoption by public hospitals is mainly determined by hospital inputs and outputs. However, the use of both medical technologies is mainly influenced by conventional radiology studies and CT adoption. These results suggest that both choices - adoption and use of advanced medical technology - may be separate decisions as they are taken possibly by different people (the former by managers and policymakers and the latter by physicians).

Automated summary

This study found that the adoption and use of advanced medical technologies by public hospitals are mainly determined by hospital inputs and outputs, with the use of the technologies being influenced by conventional radiology studies and CT adoption. The results suggest that the decisions to adopt and use advanced medical technology may be separate, possibly made by different individuals such as managers, policymakers, and physicians.