4.4 Article

Level of advanced oxidation protein products is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis

期刊

BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02451-2

关键词

Carotid intima-media thickness; Advanced oxidation protein products; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. Semmelweis University
  2. National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary [NVKP-16-1-2016-0017]
  3. Higher Education Institutional Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities in Hungary
  4. Development of scientific workshops of medical-, health-and pharmaceutical sciences educations [EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The level of advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs) is positively correlated with carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) among males, independent of cardiovascular risk factors.
Background Oxidative stress is an important factor in the pathomechanism of atherosclerosis. Advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs) are considered markers of oxidative stress. Thickening of the carotid intima-media layers indicates subclinical atherosclerosis and can be detected by carotid ultrasound. Objective Our aim was to examine the association between carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and the level of AOPPs. Methods Carotid duplex scans and measurements of AOPPs were performed on 476 participants of a cardiovascular population study. The presence of conventional cardiovascular risk factors was investigated with a questionnaire, physical examination, and laboratory tests. Results There was a positive correlation between maximum CIMT and the level of AOPPs only in the male population (r = 0.219, p = 0.033). Multivariate analysis has revealed that the association between AOPPs and mean or maximum CIMT was independent of cardiovascular risk factors (OR = 1.458, p = 0.004, and OR = 2.038, p < 0.001). Conclusions Among males, the elevated level of AOPPs as a marker of oxidative stress may signal the existence of early atherosclerotic alterations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据