4.4 Review

Randomised controlled cognition trials in remitted patients with mood disorders published between 2015 and 2021: A systematic review by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Targeting Cognition Task Force

期刊

BIPOLAR DISORDERS
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 354-374

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bdi.13193

关键词

bipolar disorder; cognitive impairment; intervention; ISBD Task Force; major depressive disorder; randomised controlled trials; recommendations; systematic review

资金

  1. 5-year Lundbeck Foundation Fellowship [R215-2015-4121]
  2. NHMRC Early Career Fellowship [GNT1088785]
  3. University of Melbourne
  4. Health Research Council of New Zealand [19/082]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PI15/00283, PI18/00805]
  6. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)
  7. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  8. CIBER of Mental Health (CIBERSAM)
  9. Secretaria d'Universitats i Recerca del Departament d'Economia i Coneixement [2017 SGR 1365]
  10. CERCA Programme
  11. Departament de Salut de la Generalitat de Catalunya [SLT006/17/00357]
  12. ISCIII-Subdireccion General de Evaluacion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review provides an update on pro-cognitive treatments for patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder in remission. Cognitive remediation (CR) showed the most consistent cognitive benefits, while neuromodulatory interventions and pharmacological interventions had unclear efficacy. It is recommended for future research to increase sample sizes, pre-screen patients for cognitive impairment, select one primary outcome, investigate multimodal interventions, and include neuroimaging.
Background Cognitive impairments are an emerging treatment target in mood disorders, but currently there are no evidence-based pro-cognitive treatments indicated for patients in remission. With this systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Targeting Cognition Task force provides an update of the most promising treatments and methodological recommendations. Methods The review included RCTs of candidate pro-cognitive interventions in fully or partially remitted patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder. We followed the procedures of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycInfo, EMBASE and Cochrane Library from January 2015, when two prior systematic reviews were conducted, until February 2021. Two independent authors reviewed the studies with the Revised Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool for Randomised trials. Results We identified 16 RCTs (N = 859) investigating cognitive remediation (CR; k = 6; N = 311), direct current or repetitive magnetic stimulation (k = 3; N = 127), or pharmacological interventions (k = 7; N = 421). CR showed most consistent cognitive benefits, with two trials showing improvements on primary outcomes. Neuromodulatory interventions revealed no clear efficacy. Among pharmacological interventions, modafinil and lurasidone showed early positive results. Sources of bias included small samples, lack of pre-screening for objective cognitive impairment, no primary outcome and no information on allocation sequence masking. Conclusions Evidence for pro-cognitive treatments in mood disorders is emerging. Recommendations are to increase sample sizes, pre-screen for impairment in targeted domain(s), select one primary outcome, aid transfer to real-world functioning, investigate multimodal interventions and include neuroimaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据