4.6 Article

Cell-derived and enzyme-based decellularized extracellular matrix exhibit compositional and structural differences that are relevant for its use as a biomaterial

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 119, 期 4, 页码 1142-1156

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.28047

关键词

adipose-derived stem cells; biomaterial; cell-derived matrix; decellularization; extracellular matrix

资金

  1. Peter and Traudl Engelhorn Foundation
  2. Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
  3. German Science Foundation [INST37/829-1FUGG]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared and characterized human adipose tissue-derived dECM and cdECM, revealing differences in molecular composition, structural characteristics, and biological purity. These findings can aid researchers in selecting suitable ECM-based biomaterials for specific applications and interpreting experimental results.
Due to its availability and minimal invasive harvesting human adipose tissue-derived extracellular matrix (dECM) is often used as a biomaterial in various tissue engineering and healthcare applications. Next to dECM, cell-derived ECM (cdECM) can be generated by and isolated from in vitro cultured cells. So far both types of ECM were investigated extensively toward their application as (bio)material in tissue engineering and healthcare. However, a systematic characterization and comparison of soft tissue dECM and cdECM is still missing. In this study, we characterized dECM from human adipose tissue, as well as cdECM from human adipose-derived stem cells, toward their molecular composition, structural characteristics, and biological purity. The dECM was found to exhibit higher levels of collagens and lower levels of sulfated glycosaminoglycans compared with cdECMs. Structural characteristics revealed an immature state of the fibrous part of cdECM samples. By the identified differences, we aim to support researchers in the selection of a suitable ECM-based biomaterial for their specific application and the interpretation of obtained results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据