4.7 Article

Modelling carbon dioxide emissions under a maize-soy rotation using machine learning

期刊

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 1-18

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.09.013

关键词

CO2 emissions; Agricultural soils; Machine learning algorithms; Classic regression; Shallow neural networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares six machine learning models in predicting CO2 emissions from agricultural soils, and finds that random forest (RF) is the best model for predicting CO2 emissions under different fertilizer treatments.
Climatic parameters influence CO2 emissions and the complexity of the relationship is not fully captured in biophysical models. Machine learning (ML) is now being applied to environmental problems, and it is, therefore, opportune to investigate ML models in CO2 predictions from agricultural soils. In this study, six ML models were compared for their predictive performance by comparing field measurements of CO2 emissions from two fertiliser treatments: inorganic fertiliser (IF) and solid cattle manure supplemented with inorganic fertiliser (SCM) applied to a maize-soy rotation. The study also included a generalised scenario where all the data from IF and SCM were included in one dataset. The ML models include support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), feed-forward neural network (FNN), radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), and extreme learning machine (ELM). The input parameters were soil moisture, soil temperature, soil organic matter, soil total carbon, soil total nitrogen, air temperature, solar radiation and pan evaporation, while the output parameter was field measured CO2 emissions. The results of this study demonstrated that RF was the best at predicting CO2 emissions from IF [coefficient of determination (R-2) = 0.92 and root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.27], SCM (R-2 = 0.94 and RMSE = 2.86) and generalised scenarios (R-2 = 0.86 and RMSE = 3.05). We conclude that ML models provide an innovative, robust and time-efficient alternative to biophysical models. (C) 2021 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据