4.5 Article

Quantifying the Finest Particles in Dust Fractions Created During the Sanding of Untreated and Thermally Modified Beech Wood

期刊

BIORESOURCES
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 7-20

出版社

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV DEPT WOOD & PAPER SCI
DOI: 10.15376/biores.17.1.7-20

关键词

Sieve analysis; Laser diffraction methods; Particle-size distribution; Sanding; Occupational risk; ANOVA

资金

  1. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-18-0378, APVV-19-0269, VEGA 1/0324/21, KEGA 026UMB-4/2021]
  2. Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences [506.227.02.00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the fractionation of wood dust after sanding, comparing untreated wood dust to thermally modified wood dust. The results show that both types of wood dust have similar particle size distributions and that all fractions contain the finest particles that are suspendable in the air.
This article deals with the fractionation of wood dust by sieve after sanding. Dust from untreated beechwood was compared to dust from thermally modified beechwood (at 200 degrees C for 3 h). The authors hypothesized that the thermal modification changes the particle size distributions of the dust sieve fractions and that all the dust sieve fractions contain the finest particles, which are suspendable in the air and are potentially respirable. To obtain dust for testing, both wood materials were sanded with P120 paper at a belt speed of 14.5 m/s and a pressure of 0.65 N/cm(2). A set of sieves with aperture sizes of 25, 80, and 250 mu m were used to separate the dust into sieve fractions with grain sizes less than 25 mu m, 25 to 80 mu m, 80 to 250 mu m, and greater than 250 mu m. The content of the finest particles in the fractions was measured via a laser particle sizer. Both dusts had similar particle size distributions. In addition, each investigated fraction of both dusts contained the finest particles, i.e., less than 10 mu m. It follows that the laser analysis method may be necessary to correctly assess the occupational risk at a sanding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据