4.8 Article

Fate of a biobased polymer via high-solid anaerobic co-digestion with food waste and following aerobic treatment: Insights on changes of polymer physicochemical properties and the role of microbial and fungal communities

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 343, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126079

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; PBAT/PLA; Food waste; Degradation; Microbial analysis

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD1100600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52000144]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019 M661626]
  4. Key Research and Development Project of Zhejiang Province, China [2021C03024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the degradation of PBAT/PLA based biopolymer bags during digestion processes, finding no biological degradation after digestion but subsequent aerobic treatment facilitated the degradation of polymers.
Degradation of bioplastics in food-waste-treating anaerobic digestion (AD) plants is becoming an increasingly concerning issue as they are inevitably mixed with food waste during the waste collection process. The aim of this study was to assess the degradation of PBAT/PLA based biopolymer bags during mesophilic and thermophilic AD, co-digested with food waste, and subsequent aerobic post-treatment. After the AD process, no discernable biological degradation was observed for all of the PBAT/PLA polymers. The comparison of FTIR, XRD, TG analysis and contact angle analysis between raw and degraded PBAT/PLA polymer revealed structural changes after anaerobic incubation. Subsequent aerobic treatment facilitated the degradation of the PBAT/PLA polymers from thermophilic AD, which was attributed to the polymer-degrading microorganisms Brevundimonas and Sphingobacterium. Physical disintegration of the PBAT/PLA polymer was observed under thermophilic conditions. Those undegraded polymer fragments could affect digestate quality and increase the risk of releasing microplastics into the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据