4.8 Article

Mesophilic condition is more conducive to methane production yield and tylosin removal on tylosin fermentation dreg anaerobic digestion

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 341, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125806

关键词

Antibiotic fermentation dreg; Anaerobic fermentation; Tylosin; Food waste; Kinetic

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1900903]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [8192028]
  3. National Environmental and Energy Base for International Science & Technology Cooperation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that mesophilic anaerobic digestion is more effective for treating tylosin fermentation dreg, especially when co-digesting with food waste. However, thermophilic anaerobic digestion has higher methane production rate and hydrolysis rate, but lower residual antibiotics. The addition of food waste can enhance methane production rate and yield under both temperature conditions.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) of antibiotic fermentation dreg is effective because of its satisfactory methanogenic performance and antibiotic removal rate. Thermophilic AD, an important branch, has not been studied. This study explored the effects of mesophilic and thermophilic AD on tylosin fermentation dreg (TFD) alone-digestion and co-digestion with food waste. The methane production (245-420 mL/g-VS) of mesophilic AD was 20.7%- 28.6% higher than thermophilic AD, but the maximum methane production rate (RM), lag period (lambda), and hydrolysis rate constant (kh) of thermophilic AD were 1.81, 0.236 and 3.16 times higher than those of mesophilic AD, respectively. However, the residual tylosin in mesophilic AD was always higher than that in thermophilic AD. The addition of food waste increased the methane production rate and yield under both temperature conditions. Therefore, due to the higher rate and yield of methane production, mesophilic AD, especially codigestion, is more suitable for the treatment of TFD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据