4.8 Article

In-situ catalytic upgrading of bio-oil from rapid pyrolysis of biomass over hollow HZSM-5 with mesoporous shell

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 341, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125874

关键词

Hollow HZSM-5; Mesoporous structure; Rapid pyrolysis; Bio-oil upgrading; Aromatic hydrocarbons selectivity

资金

  1. Hirosaki University Fund, Japan
  2. Monkasho scholarship, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The issue of narrow micropores in traditional protonic type Zeolite Socony Mobil-5 (HZSM-5) catalysts, which restrict the diffusion of large-molecular reactants/products, was tackled by preparing hollow HZSM-5 with a mesoporous shell. The efficient catalyst of Hollow(30)-TP showed significantly higher aromatic hydrocarbon yields for cellulose and hemicellulose compared to traditional HZSM-5, and exhibited excellent reusability and regeneration due to increased accessibility to acid sites.
To solve the issue of narrow micropores in traditional protonic type Zeolite Socony Mobil-5 (HZSM-5) catalysts in the restricting of large-molecular reactants/products diffusion, hollow HZSM-5 with a mesoporous shell was prepared using a hydrothermal method combined with a tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (TPAOH) treatment process. Applying for in-situ catalyst upgrading of bio-oil from rapid pyrolysis of biomass, the obtained most efficient catalyst of Hollow(30)-TP resulted in aromatic hydrocarbon yields in the range of 78.49-78.67% for cellulose and hemicellulose, which is much greater than those using the traditional HZSM-5 (61.06-68.26%). Furthermore, in the case using real biomass (cedar) with an optimal biomass/catalyst weight ratio of 1:2, the aromatic hydrocarbon yield reached up to 80.16%. In addition, this catalyst exhibited excellent reusability and regeneration property due to the increased accessibility to the acid sites in the hollow HZSM-5 for the improving of the reaction rate as well as the reducing of coking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据