4.8 Review

Algal-based system for removal of emerging pollutants from wastewater: A review

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 344, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126245

关键词

Algal bioremediation; Emerging pollutants; Classification; Removal strategies; Mechanism

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, India under its initiative Mission innovation Challenge Scheme (IC4)
  2. project A novel integrated biorefinery for conversion of lignocellulosic agro waste into value-added products and bioenergy [BT/PR31054/PBD/26/763/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Algal bioremediation via algae biotechnology is a cost-effective solution for emerging pollutants in wastewater, but it is not fully developed commercially. Research has focused on developing different technologies and strategies to meet specific needs, with challenges including the selection of suitable algal species and operational conditions in pilot-scale studies.
The bioremediation of emerging pollutants in wastewater via algal biotechnology has been emerging as a costeffective and low-energy input technological solution. However, the algal bioremediation technology is still not fully developed at a commercial level. The development of different technologies and new strategies to cater specific needs have been studied. The existence of multiple emerging pollutants and the selection of microalgal species is a major concern. The rate of algal bioremediation is influenced by various factors, including accidental contaminations and operational conditions in the pilot-scale studies. Algal-bioremediation can be combined with existing treatment technologies for efficient removal of emerging pollutants from wastewater. This review mainly focuses on algal-bioremediation systems for wastewater treatment and pollutant removal, the impact of emerging pollutants in the environment, selection of potential microalgal species, mechanisms involved, and challenges in removing emerging pollutants using algal-bioremediation systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据