4.8 Article

Bacterial survival strategies in sludge alkaline fermentation for volatile fatty acids production: Study on the physiological properties, temporal evolution and spatial distribution of bacterial community

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 340, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125701

关键词

Sludge alkaline fermentation; Volatile fatty acids; Bacterial survival strategies; Phospholipid fatty acids; Bacterial community distribution

资金

  1. National Water Pollution Control and Treatment Science and Technology Major Project [2017ZX07202003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed that bacteria in sludge alkaline fermentation (SAF) can enhance their survival by increasing ATP synthase activity and unsaturated fatty acids content. Firmicutes were identified as the dominant microorganisms at pH 10, influencing VFAs production. The spatial distribution analysis indicated that Firmicutes mainly reside inside flocs during SAF.
This study investigated the dynamics of ATP synthase activity, phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profile, and temporal evolution and spatial distribution of bacterial community to analyze bacterial survival strategies in sludge alkaline fermentation (SAF) for volatile fatty acids (VFAs) production. The results revealed a significant increase in ATP synthase activity at pH 9 and 10 (p < 0.05), which could contribute to proton entry into cells and benefit bacterial survival. PLFA analysis indicated that the unsaturated fatty acids content increased with the increase of pH. Firmicutes were the dominant microorganisms in the running stage of the pH 10 reactor (35.81-62.34%) and might have been the key microbes that influenced VFAs production. Further analysis of the spatial distribution of microbial community suggested that Firmicutes mainly lived inside flocs during SAF. These findings provide an understanding for bacterial survival strategies in SAF, which could help to develop methods to further improve VFAs yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据