4.8 Article

Autotrophic (C1-gas) versus heterotrophic (fructose) accumulation of acetic acid and ethanol in Clostridium aceticum

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 337, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125485

关键词

Carbon monoxide; Carbon dioxide; Solventogenesis; Syngas; Wood-Ljungdahl pathway

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MINECO) [CTQ201788292-R]
  2. European FEDER funds
  3. Xunta de Galicia [ED431C 2017/66]
  4. European ERA-IB7 project OBAC [PCIN2016-148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of carbon source, CO or fructose, on the metabolism and growth of Clostridium aceticum was investigated. Optimal growth conditions with CO showed the highest specific growth rate and acetic acid production, while fructose fermentation resulted in formic acid inhibition. The carbon source had a selective effect on metabolic patterns and solventogenesis of C. aceticum.
The influence of the carbon source on the metabolism and growth of Clostridium aceticum was investigated, supplying either CO or fructose as sole carbon source. The acid and solvent production patterns were determined under either autotrophic or heterotrophic conditions, elucidating the effect of pH on the substrate's bioconversion pattern. The highest maximum specific growth rate was observed with CO, under the organism's optimal growth conditions, reaching 0.052 h-1 and an acetic acid concentration of 18 g.L- 1. The production of 4.4 g.L- 1 ethanol was also possible, after medium acidification, during CO bioconversion. Conversely, formic acid inhibition was observed during fructose fermentation under optimal growth conditions. In the latter experiments, it was not possible to stimulate solvent production when growing C. aceticum on fructose, despite applying the same medium acidification strategy as with CO, showing the selective effect of the carbon source (autotrophic vs heterotrophic) on the metabolic pattern and solventogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据