4.8 Article

Impact of ciprofloxacin and copper combined pollution on activated sludge: Abundant-rare taxa and antibiotic resistance genes

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 349, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126882

关键词

Ciprofloxacin; Stress; and post-effects; Full-scale classification; Antibiotic resistance genes; Potential hosts

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808013]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC0704800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impacts of combined pollution on activated sludge system, finding that higher concentrations of ciprofloxacin inhibit nitrification and different enriched genera exhibit different sensitivities to the combined pollution. In addition, ammonia oxidation genes are inhibited by high concentrations of ciprofloxacin, while some aerobic denitrifying bacteria and their key genes increase.
This study aimed to explore the impacts of ciprofloxacin (CIP, 0.05-40 mg/L) and copper (3 mg/L) combined pollution on nitrification, microbial community and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in activated sludge system during stress-and post-effect periods. Higher CIP concentration inhibited nitrification and an average of 50% total nitrogen removal occurred under 40 mg/L of CIP pressure. The stress-and post-effects on bacterial diversity and structure were obviously distinct. Abundant genera were more sensitive to combined pollution than rare genera based on full-scale classification and conditionally rare or abundant taxa were keystone taxa in their interactions. Ammonia oxidation genes were inhibited under high CIP level, but some aerobic denitrifying bacteria (Thauera, Comamonas and Azoarcus) and key genes increased. 96 ARG subtypes were detected with complex positive relationships and their potential hosts (abundant-rare-functional genera) changed in two periods. This study highlights the different stress-and post-effects of combined pollution on activated sludge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据