4.8 Review

Current understanding and perspectives in anaerobic digestion based on genome-resolved metagenomic approaches

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 344, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126350

关键词

Next-generation sequencing; Microbial community; Metagenomics; Anaerobic digestion; Genome-centric analysis

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2021R1A2C2007319, 2020R1A6A1A03045059]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A6A1A03045059] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anaerobic digestion is a technique that uses diverse microorganisms to treat high concentrations of organic waste and produce methane gas as a renewable energy source. However, further research is needed to understand the functional roles and metabolic interactions of microbial populations involved in the process.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a technique that can be used to treat high concentrations of various organic wastes using a consortium of functionally diverse microorganisms under anaerobic conditions. Methane gas, a beneficial by-product of the AD process, is a renewable energy source that can replace fossil fuels following purification. However, detailed functional roles and metabolic interactions between microbial populations involved in organic waste removal and methanogenesis are yet to be known. Recent metagenomic approaches based on advanced high-throughput sequencing techniques have enabled the exploration of holistic microbial taxonomy and functionality of complex microbial populations involved in the AD process. Gene-centric and genome-centric analyses based on metagenome-assembled genomes are a platform that can be used to study the composition of microbial communities and their roles during AD. This review looks at how these up-to-date metagenomic analyses can be applied to promote our understanding and improved the development of the AD process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据