4.8 Review

Sustainable production of polyhydroxybutyrate from autotrophs using CO2 as feedstock: Challenges and opportunities

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 341, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125751

关键词

Polyhydroxybutyrate; Autotrophs; Microalgae; Cyanobacteria; Metabolic engineering

资金

  1. Carbon to X Project [2020M3H7A1098295]
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2019R1A2C3009821/2020R1A5A1018052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global energy consumption has risen dramatically due to industrialization and rapid population growth, resulting in increased CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. Utilizing CO2 for the production of biopolymer PHB has received increasing attention as a sustainable solution, with advances in cheaper renewable feedstocks and genetic engineering for microbial strains playing key roles.
Due to industrialization and rapid increase in world population, the global energy consumption has increased dramatically. As a consequence, there is increased consumption of fossil fuels, leading to a rapid increase in CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. This accumulated CO2 can be efficiently used by autotrophs as a carbon source to produce chemicals and biopolymers. There has been increasing attention on the production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), a biopolymer, with focus on reducing the production cost. For this, cheaper renewable feedstocks, molecular tools, including metabolic and genetic engineering have been explored to improve microbial strains along with process engineering aspects for scale-up of PHB production. This review discusses the recent advents on the utilization of CO2 as feedstock especially by engineered autotrophs, for sustainable production of PHB. The review also discusses the innovations in cultivation technology and process monitoring while understanding the underlying mechanisms for CO2 to biopolymer conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据