4.8 Article

Influence of products portfolio and process contextualization on the economic performance of small- and large-scale avocado biorefineries

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 342, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126060

关键词

Rural zones; Marketable products; Agricultural products upgrading; Biorefineries; Economic assessment

资金

  1. PROGRAMA DE INVESTIGACION RECONSTRUCCION DEL TEJIDO SOCIAL EN ZONAS DE POS-CONFLICTO EN COLOMBIA within the research project COMPETENCIAS EMPRE-SARIALES Y DE INNOVACION PARA EL DESARROLLO ECONOMICO Y LA INCLUSION PRODUCTIVA DE LAS REGIONES AFECTADAS POR E [57579, 58907]
  2. Colombia Cientifica [FP44842-213-2018]
  3. Minciencias [80740-903-2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research paper evaluates the economic performance of avocado-based biorefineries with different processing scales and product portfolios. Small-scale operations are better suited for rural areas, while large-scale processes are more efficient in producing products like levulinic acid and furfural.
This research paper seeks to evaluate the influence of the context, processing scale, and portfolio of products on the economic performance of different avocado-based biorefineries. For this, two scenarios in small and large-scale biorefineries were compared. The case of scenario 1 (avocado oil, animal feed, and electricity produc-tion) was the best small-scale alternative to be implemented in rural zones than scenario 2 (guacamole and electricity production). The minimum Processing Scale for Economic Feasibility was 0.85 and 1.1 ton/day for scenarios 1 and 2. Compared to lactic acid and xylitol production, the large-scale process addressed to produce levulinic acid, furfural, and lignin (scenario 1) was the best option (scenario 2). In scenario 1, the minimum Processing Scale for Economic Feasibility was 15.50 ton/day compared with scenario 2 of 41.95 ton/day. Based on these values, scenario 1 has the highest feasibility of being implemented in countries such as Colombia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据