4.2 Article

Rapid, multiplexed detection of the let-7 miRNA family using γPNA amphiphiles in micelle-tagging electrophoresis

期刊

BIOPOLYMERS
卷 113, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bip.23479

关键词

capillary electrophoresis; DNA electrophoresis; micelle electrokinetic chromatography; micelle-tagging electrophoresis; microRNA (miRNA)

资金

  1. David Scaife Foundation [141RA01]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-1605351]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

miRNA is a promising class of biomarkers, but their low abundance and high sequence homology make detection difficult. A new method using gamma PNAA and DNA nanotags in MTE allows for independent detection of seven members of the let-7 miRNA family, with strong tolerance to serum proteins.
miRNA is a promising class of biomarkers whose levels can be assayed to detect various forms of cancer and other serious diseases. These short, noncoding nucleic acids are difficult to detect due to their low abundance and the marginal stability of their duplexes with DNA probes. In addition, miRNAs within the same family have high sequence homology, and often, related miRNA differ in sequence by only a single base. In this report, we demonstrate an independent detection seven members of the let-7 family of miRNA in a single run. Key to success is the use of mini-PEG-substituted PNA amphiphiles (gamma PNAA) and highly fluorescent DNA nanotags in micelle tagging electrophoresis (MTE). Multiplexed detection is accomplished in capillary electrophoresis (CE) using oligomeric nanotags of pre-programmed lengths where the presence of a specific miRNA links its nanotag to a micelle drag-tag, which shifts the nanotag elution time to a defined region for detection. We further demonstrate that the peak shape and elution time are unaffected by the presence of up to 10 mg/ml of serum protein in the sample, with a total runtime of less than 4 min and a LOD of 10-100 pM. We discuss efforts to substantially decrease the detection limit using nanotags that are >1000 bp in length.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据