4.7 Article

Bisfischoids A and B, dimeric ent-abietane-type diterpenoids with anti-inflammatory potential from Euphorbia fischeriana Steud.

期刊

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 116, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105356

关键词

Diterpenoid dimer; Euphorbia fischeriana Steud; Soluble epoxide hydrolase; Molecular dynamics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81930112, 82003923]
  2. Liaoning Provincial Key RD Program [2019JH2/10300022]
  3. Distinguished professor of Liaoning Province [XLYC2002008]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2020-BS-203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two undescribed ent-abietane-type diterpenoid dimers with nonacyclic backbone, bisfischoids A and B, were identified, along with a known compound fischdiabietane A, from Euphorbia fischeriana Steud. These compounds showed promising anti-inflammatory activities by inhibiting soluble epoxide hydrolase, with bisfischoid B exhibiting the strongest inhibitory effect. Further molecular docking studies revealed the key amino acid residue Tyr343 in the catalytic cavity of sEH for their inhibitory function.
Two undescribed ent-abietane-type diterpenoid dimers with nonacyclic backbone formed by intermolecular [4 + 2] cycloaddition into a spirocyclic skeleton, bisfischoids A (1) and B (2), along with a known one fischdiabietane A (3), were identified from Euphorbia fischeriana Steud. Their structures were elucidated by extensive spectroscopic analysis, ECD and NMR calculation combined with DP4+ probability analysis, as well as X-ray diffraction. The anti-inflammatory potential of dimers 1-3 were examined using their inhibitory effects on soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH), which revealed that 1 and 2 exhibited promising activities with inhibition constant (Ki) of 3.20 and 1.95 mu M, respectively. Further studies of molecular docking and molecular dynamics indicated that amino acid residue Tyr343 in the catalytic cavity of sEH was the key site for their inhibitory function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据