4.3 Article

Evaluation of approaches for accommodating interactions and non-linear terms in multiple imputation of incomplete three-level data

期刊

BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
卷 64, 期 8, 页码 1404-1425

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202000343

关键词

congeniality; interactions; multiple imputation; non-linearities; substantive model compatible; three-level data

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [1127984, APP1166023]
  2. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
  3. Australian Government [DE190101326]
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1127984] Funding Source: NHMRC
  5. Australian Research Council [DE190101326] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three-level data structures in health research studies often have missing data, which are addressed with multiple imputation approaches. Various methods can be used to account for the three-level structure in substantive analysis models, particularly when interactions or quadratic effects are involved. The substantive model compatible MI has shown promise in single-level data, but there are limited approaches for incomplete three-level data.
Three-level data structures arising from repeated measures on individuals clustered within larger units are common in health research studies. Missing data are prominent in such studies and are often handled via multiple imputation (MI). Although several MI approaches can be used to account for the three-level structure, including adaptations to single- and two-level approaches, when the substantive analysis model includes interactions or quadratic effects, these too need to be accommodated in the imputation model. In such analyses, substantive model compatible (SMC) MI has shown great promise in the context of single-level data. Although there have been recent developments in multilevel SMC MI, to date only one approach that explicitly handles incomplete three-level data is available. Alternatively, researchers can use pragmatic adaptations to single- and two-level MI approaches, or two-level SMC-MI approaches. We describe the available approaches and evaluate them via simulations in the context of three three-level random effects analysis models involving an interaction between the incomplete time-varying exposure and time, an interaction between the time-varying exposure and an incomplete time-fixed confounder, or a quadratic effect of the exposure. Results showed that all approaches considered performed well in terms of bias and precision when the target analysis involved an interaction with time, but the three-level SMC MI approach performed best when the target analysis involved an interaction between the time-varying exposure and an incomplete time-fixed confounder, or a quadratic effect of the exposure. We illustrate the methods using data from the Childhood to Adolescence Transition Study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据