4.3 Article

The effect of iron on Chilean Alexandrium catenella growth and paralytic shellfish toxin production as related to algal blooms

期刊

BIOMETALS
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 39-51

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10534-021-00349-2

关键词

Trace metal; Iron; Alexandrium catenella; Paralytic shellfish toxin (PST); Harmful algal bloom (HAB)

资金

  1. [JPMJSA1705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated how iron conditions affect the growth and toxin production of A. catenella isolated from southern Chile, finding that optimal iron concentration is crucial for growth, while excess or insufficient iron can impact growth and toxin production.
The dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella is a well-known paralytic shellfish toxin producer that forms harmful algal blooms (HABs) worldwide. Blooms of this species have repeatedly brought severe ecological and economic impacts to Chile, especially in the southern region, where the shellfish and salmon industries are world-famous. The mechanisms of such HABs have been intensively studied but are still unclear. Nutrient overloading is one of the often-discussed drivers for HABs. The present study used the A. catenella strain isolated from southern Chile to investigate how iron conditions could affect their growth and toxin production as related to HAB. Our results showed that an optimum concentration of iron was pivotal for proper A. catenella growth. Thus, while excess iron exerted a toxic effect, low iron media led to iron insufficiency and growth inhibition. In addition, the study shows that the degree of paralytic shellfish toxin production by A. catenella varied depending on the iron concentration in the culture media. The A. catenella strain from southern Chile produced GTX1-4 exclusively in the fmol cell(-1) scale. Based on these findings, we suggest that including iron and paralytic shellfish toxin measurements in the fields can improve the current HAB monitoring and contribute to an understanding of A. catenella bloom dynamics in Chile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据