4.4 Article

LC-MS/MS method for determination of kansuinine a in rat plasma and its application to a rat pharmacokinetic study

期刊

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.5282

关键词

bioavailability; kansuinine A; LC-MS; MS; pharmacokinetic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the determination of Kansuinine A in rat plasma, showing excellent linearity and precision. The method was successfully applied in a pre-clinical pharmacokinetic study in rats.
Kansuinine A is a macrocyclic jatrophane diterpene isolated from the plant Euphorbia kansui Liou. It exhibits many pharmacological activities including cytoxic, antitumor, antiallergic and proinflammatory effects. In the present study, a simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS method was established and validated for the determination of kansuinine A in rat plasma. After methanol-mediated protein precipitation, chromatographic separation was achieved on an Acquity BEH C-18 column (2.1 x 100 mm, 1.7 mu m) using acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid in water as mobile phase by gradient elution. Kansuinine A and IS were quantified in negative multiple reaction monitoring mode with ion transitions at m/z 731.1-693.2 for kansuinine A and m/z 723.2-623.1 for IS. The method showed excellent linearity over the range 1-500 ng/ml. The intra- and inter-day precisions (relative standard deviation) were 2.13-4.28 and 3.83-7.67%, respectively, whereas accuracy (relative error) ranged from -4.17 to 3.73%. The extraction recovery, stability and matrix effect met the requirement of the regulations issued by the US Food and Drug Administration. The validated method was successfully applied to the pre-clinical pharmacokinetic study of kansuinine A in rats after oral administration (20 mg/kg) and intravenous administration (2 mg/kg). This study provides valuable reference for the further study of E. kansui liou, especially for the drug development and clinical application of kansuinine A.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据