4.7 Article

Adding Humic Acids to Gelatin Hydrogels: A Way to Tune Gelation

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 443-453

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01398

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explores the potential of humic acids (HAs) in improving gelatin's mechanical and thermal properties. It found that HAs can enhance gel strength through noncovalent interactions with gelatin via hydrogen bonding, but excessive concentrations of HAs could weaken the gel.
Exploring the chance to convert biowaste into a valuable resource, this study tests the potential role of humic acids (HA), a class of multifunctional compounds obtained by oxidative decomposition of biomass, as physical agents to improve gelatin's mechanical and thermal properties. To this purpose, gelatin-HA aqueous samples were prepared at increasing HA content. HA/gelatin concentrations changed in the range 2.67-26.67 (wt/wt)%. Multiple techniques were employed to assess the influence of HA content on the gel properties and to unveil the underlying mechanisms. HAs increased gel strength up to a concentration of 13.33 (wt/wt)% and led to a weaker gel at higher concentrations. FT-IR and DSC results proved that HAs can establish noncovalent interactions through H-bonding with gelatin. Coagulation phenomena occur because of HA-gelatin interactions, and at concentrations greater than 13.33 (wt/wt)%, HAs established preferential bonds with water molecules, preventing them from coordinating with gelatin chains. These features were accompanied by a change in the secondary structure of gelatin, which lost the triple helix structure and exhibited an increase in the random coil conformation. Besides, higher HA weight content caused swelling phenomena due to HA water absorption, contributing to a weaker gel. The current findings may be useful to enable a better control of gelatin structures modified with composted biowaste, extending their exploitation for a large set of technological applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据